I was wondering - who claims the brand of (something akin to) decentralized scholarship OR immutable scholarship - kinda like the seed bank in Svalbard, but with the kind of redundancy you can only imagine in the representational/virtualized form …
an interoperable protocol for multi-storage (presumably IPFS is only one place that the app reads/writes, since I've got things offline I'm interacting with… scholarship (which, if it's good for scholarship {as a brand that delivers on the fullness of self reflection - 'reading and writing is a place wherein we'd expect new expressions to reading and writing to be documented' or so the argument would go} - why wouldn't anything want to be stored within it?)*
*but witness my experience right now where I wanted to go off in another direction (here's where zigzag is a further development of the next adjacent adjacency after you've been imaginatively residing inside of xanalogical structure…?)
now I'm clearer of the value to reaching out to Ted & (coming to) conversing … BUT I WANT TO DO THIS IN CONNECTION WITH OTHERS…
Humans participating in a network of conversations with cryptographic assurances - this kind of hyper-object almost necessarily is our key point of leverage against …chaos &… more unilateral … forces
I'm imagining the actual structure of of people working alongside each other
there ought to be a competition online for the most 'strengthened by {'permissionless?'} feedback' processes to form the basis for new, decentralized institution(s)… it might sound like multiple things, but it's most useful to be one thing, with manifold aspects… spoiler alter, it's language…
Solves rational ignorance because whenever someone asks a new question, it’s now in existence …
thesis: information wants to be free
antithesis: information wants to be expensive
synthesis: best practices want to be practiced (evolution)
"The order of civilization" from Stewart Brand's Clock Of The Long Now
mentioned in recent StopAI Discord comment
hypertext solve all collective action problems?
is there a full inventory of collective action problems?
if you take for granted that the future is a function of the conversation we're having now, then you'll get interested in the abstraction strength of the language you're using to organize/ structure how you're going to be setting up your attention to be empowered in the future